[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f0780139-5322-a028-0091-3255e0596eff@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 11:58:13 -0500
From: Gary R Hook <gary.hook@....com>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, joro@...tes.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] iommu/amd: Add basic debugfs infrastructure for
AMD IOMMU
On 05/29/2018 01:39 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 01:23:23PM -0500, Gary R Hook wrote:
>> Implement a skeleton framework for debugfs support in the
>> AMD IOMMU. Add a hidden boolean to Kconfig that is defined
>> for the AMD IOMMU when general IOMMY DebugFS support is
>> enabled.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gary R Hook <gary.hook@....com>
>> ---
>> drivers/iommu/Kconfig | 4 ++++
>> drivers/iommu/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_debugfs.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_init.c | 6 ++++--
>> drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_proto.h | 6 ++++++
>> drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_types.h | 5 +++++
>> 6 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_debugfs.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig b/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
>> index f9af25ac409f..ec223f6f4ad4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
>> @@ -137,6 +137,10 @@ config AMD_IOMMU
>> your BIOS for an option to enable it or if you have an IVRS ACPI
>> table.
>>
>> +config AMD_IOMMU_DEBUGFS
>> + def_bool y
>
> Why default y? Can you not boot a box without this? If not, it should
> not be Y.
Again, apologies for not seeing this sooner.
Yes, the system can boot without this. The idea of a hidden option was
surfaced by Robin, and after my first approach was shot down, I tried this.
Logic: If the over-arching IOMMU debugfs option is enabled, then
AMD_IOMMU_DEBUGFS gets defined, and AMD IOMMU code gets included.
This issue was discussed a few weeks ago. No single approach appears to
satisfy everyone. I like this because it depends upon one switch: Do you
want DebugFS support enabled in the IOMMU driver, period?
Vendor-specific code can then choose to implement support or not, and a
builder doesn't have to worry about enabling/disabling multiple Kconfig
options.
At least, that was my line of reasoning.
I'm not married to any approach, and I don't find clever use of Kconfig
options too terribly challenging. And I'm not defending, I'm just
explaining.
>
>> + depends on AMD_IOMMU && IOMMU_DEBUGFS
>> +
>> config AMD_IOMMU_V2
>> tristate "AMD IOMMU Version 2 driver"
>> depends on AMD_IOMMU
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/Makefile b/drivers/iommu/Makefile
>> index 74cfbc392862..47fd6ea9de2d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/Makefile
>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_IOMMU_IOVA) += iova.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_OF_IOMMU) += of_iommu.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_MSM_IOMMU) += msm_iommu.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_AMD_IOMMU) += amd_iommu.o amd_iommu_init.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_AMD_IOMMU_DEBUGFS) += amd_iommu_debugfs.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_AMD_IOMMU_V2) += amd_iommu_v2.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_SMMU) += arm-smmu.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_V3) += arm-smmu-v3.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_debugfs.c b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_debugfs.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..6dff98552969
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_debugfs.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/*
>> + * AMD IOMMU driver
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2018 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
>> + *
>> + * Author: Gary R Hook <gary.hook@....com>
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/debugfs.h>
>> +#include <linux/iommu.h>
>> +#include <linux/pci.h>
>> +#include "amd_iommu_proto.h"
>> +#include "amd_iommu_types.h"
>> +
>> +static struct dentry *amd_iommu_debugfs;
>> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(amd_iommu_debugfs_lock);
>> +
>> +#define MAX_NAME_LEN 20
>> +
>> +void amd_iommu_debugfs_setup(struct amd_iommu *iommu)
>> +{
>> + char name[MAX_NAME_LEN + 1];
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&amd_iommu_debugfs_lock);
>> + if (!amd_iommu_debugfs)
>> + amd_iommu_debugfs = iommu_debugfs_new_driver_dir("amd");
>> + mutex_unlock(&amd_iommu_debugfs_lock);
>> +
>> + if (amd_iommu_debugfs) {
>
> Do not test this.
Okay, noted. I'll stop worrying about this.
>
>> + snprintf(name, MAX_NAME_LEN, "iommu%02d", iommu->index);
>> + iommu->debugfs = debugfs_create_dir(name,
>> + amd_iommu_debugfs);
>> + if (!iommu->debugfs) {
>
> No, you don't care about the return value of any debugfs call. Just
> save the directory and move on. If it's not correct, find, nothing is
> wrong, just keep going.
Roger.
Thank you,
Gary
Powered by blists - more mailing lists