[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3249cc11-09d8-2078-28a6-efd3078ca0e9@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 12:01:41 -0500
From: Gary R Hook <gary.hook@....com>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, joro@...tes.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] iommu - Enable debugfs exposure of IOMMU driver
internals
On 05/29/2018 01:41 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 01:23:14PM -0500, Gary R Hook wrote:
>> Provide base enablement for using debugfs to expose internal data of an
>> IOMMU driver. When called, create the /sys/kernel/debug/iommu directory.
>>
>> Emit a strong warning at boot time to indicate that this feature is
>> enabled.
>>
>> This function is called from iommu_init, and creates the initial DebugFS
>> directory. Drivers may then call iommu_debugfs_new_driver_dir() to
>> instantiate a device-specific directory to expose internal data.
>> It will return a pointer to the new dentry structure created in
>> /sys/kernel/debug/iommu, or NULL in the event of a failure.
>>
>> Since the IOMMU driver can not be removed from the running system, there
>> is no need for an "off" function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gary R Hook <gary.hook@....com>
>> ---
>> drivers/iommu/Kconfig | 10 ++++++
>> drivers/iommu/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/iommu/iommu-debugfs.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 2 +
>> include/linux/iommu.h | 11 ++++++
>> 5 files changed, 96 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/iommu/iommu-debugfs.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig b/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
>> index c76157e57f6b..f9af25ac409f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
>> @@ -60,6 +60,16 @@ config IOMMU_IO_PGTABLE_ARMV7S_SELFTEST
>>
>> endmenu
>>
>> +config IOMMU_DEBUGFS
>> + bool "Export IOMMU internals in DebugFS"
>> + depends on DEBUG_FS
>> + help
>> + Allows exposure of IOMMU device internals. This option enables
>> + the use of debugfs by IOMMU drivers as required. Devices can,
>> + at initialization time, cause the IOMMU code to create a top-level
>> + debug/iommu directory, and then populate a subdirectory with
>> + entries as required.
>
> You didn't put a big enough warning here, like I asked last time :(
As I noted a few moments ago, I didn't see these until now. Very
annoying, that.
>
>> +
>> config IOMMU_IOVA
>> tristate
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/Makefile b/drivers/iommu/Makefile
>> index 1fb695854809..74cfbc392862 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/Makefile
>> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
>> obj-$(CONFIG_IOMMU_API) += iommu.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_IOMMU_API) += iommu-traces.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_IOMMU_API) += iommu-sysfs.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_IOMMU_DEBUGFS) += iommu-debugfs.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_IOMMU_DMA) += dma-iommu.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_IOMMU_IO_PGTABLE) += io-pgtable.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_IOMMU_IO_PGTABLE_ARMV7S) += io-pgtable-arm-v7s.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu-debugfs.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu-debugfs.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..bb1bf2d0ac51
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu-debugfs.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/*
>> + * IOMMU debugfs core infrastructure
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2018 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
>> + *
>> + * Author: Gary R Hook <gary.hook@....com>
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/pci.h>
>> +#include <linux/iommu.h>
>> +#include <linux/debugfs.h>
>> +
>> +static struct dentry *iommu_debugfs_dir;
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * iommu_debugfs_setup - create the top-level iommu directory in debugfs
>> + *
>> + * Provide base enablement for using debugfs to expose internal data of an
>> + * IOMMU driver. When called, this function creates the
>> + * /sys/kernel/debug/iommu directory.
>> + *
>> + * Emit a strong warning at boot time to indicate that this feature is
>> + * enabled.
>> + *
>> + * This function is called from iommu_init; drivers may then call
>> + * iommu_debugfs_new_driver_dir() to instantiate a vendor-specific
>> + * directory to be used to expose internal data.
>> + */
>> +void iommu_debugfs_setup(void)
>> +{
>> + if (!iommu_debugfs_dir) {
>> + iommu_debugfs_dir = debugfs_create_dir("iommu", NULL);
>> + if (iommu_debugfs_dir) {
>
> Again, no, never test a return value from a debugfs call. You do not
> care, you should do the same exact thing if it is enabled or disabled or
> somehow failing. Just keep moving on.
Yes, noted.
>
>> + pr_warn("\n");
>> + pr_warn("*************************************************************\n");
>> + pr_warn("** NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE **\n");
>> + pr_warn("** **\n");
>> + pr_warn("** IOMMU DebugFS SUPPORT HAS BEEN ENABLED IN THIS KERNEL **\n");
>> + pr_warn("** **\n");
>> + pr_warn("** This means that this kernel is built to expose internal **\n");
>> + pr_warn("** IOMMU data structures, which may compromise security on **\n");
>> + pr_warn("** your system. **\n");
>> + pr_warn("** **\n");
>> + pr_warn("** If you see this message and you are not debugging the **\n");
>> + pr_warn("** kernel, report this immediately to your vendor! **\n");
>> + pr_warn("** **\n");
>> + pr_warn("** NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE **\n");
>> + pr_warn("*************************************************************\n");
>> + }
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * iommu_debugfs_new_driver_dir - create a vendor directory under debugfs/iommu
>> + * @vendor: name of the vendor-specific subdirectory to create
>> + *
>> + * This function is called by an IOMMU driver to create the top-level debugfs
>> + * directory for that driver.
>> + *
>> + * Return: upon success, a pointer to the dentry for the new directory.
>> + * NULL in case of failure.
>> + */
>> +struct dentry *iommu_debugfs_new_driver_dir(const char *vendor)
>> +{
>> + struct dentry *d_new;
>> +
>> + d_new = debugfs_create_dir(vendor, iommu_debugfs_dir);
>> +
>> + return d_new;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_debugfs_new_driver_dir);
>
> Why are you wrapping a debugfs call? Why not just export
> iommu_debugfs_dir instead?
It was a choice, as I stated in my other post. It is not a requirement.
If you resolutely reject this approach, that's fine. I'll change it, no
worries.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists