[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202492204c2d5bd5ca27307cbca5e44673b739ed.camel@perches.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2018 10:23:40 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org,
aryabinin@...tuozzo.com, akataria@...are.com,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, brijesh.singh@....com,
caoj.fnst@...fujitsu.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
hpa@...or.com, jan.kiszka@...mens.com,
jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com, jgross@...e.com,
jpoimboe@...hat.com, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
mingo@...hat.com, mjg59@...gle.com, mka@...omium.org,
pombredanne@...b.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
thomas.lendacky@....com, tweek@...gle.com
Cc: linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
astrachan@...gle.com, manojgupta@...gle.com, ghackmann@...gle.com,
sedat.dilek@...il.com, tstellar@...hat.com, keescook@...gle.com,
yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com, michal.lkml@...kovi.net,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
will.deacon@....com, mawilcox@...rosoft.com, arnd@...db.de,
rientjes@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] compiler-gcc.h: add gnu_inline to all inline
declarations
On Tue, 2018-06-05 at 10:05 -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> Functions marked extern inline do not emit an externally visible
> function when the gnu89 C standard is used. Some KBUILD Makefiles
> overwrite KBUILD_CFLAGS. This is an issue for GCC 5.1+ users as without
> an explicit C standard specified, the default is gnu11. Since c99, the
> semantics of extern inline have changed such that an externally visible
> function is always emitted. This can lead to multiple definition errors
> of extern inline functions at link time of compilation units whose build
> files have removed an explicit C standard compiler flag for users of GCC
> 5.1+ or Clang.
[]
> diff --git a/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h b/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
[]
> @@ -72,17 +72,24 @@
> * -Wunused-function. This turns out to avoid the need for complex #ifdef
> * directives. Suppress the warning in clang as well by using "unused"
> * function attribute, which is redundant but not harmful for gcc.
> + * Prefer gnu_inline, so that extern inline functions do not emit an
> + * externally visible function. This makes extern inline behave as per gnu89
> + * semantics rather than c99. This prevents multiple symbol definition errors
> + * of extern inline functions at link time.
> */
> #if !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_OPTIMIZED_INLINING) || \
> !defined(CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING) || (__GNUC__ < 4)
> -#define inline inline __attribute__((always_inline,unused)) notrace
> -#define __inline__ __inline__ __attribute__((always_inline,unused)) notrace
> -#define __inline __inline __attribute__((always_inline,unused)) notrace
> +#define inline \
> + inline __attribute__((always_inline, unused, gnu_inline)) notrace
> +#define __inline__ \
> + __inline__ __attribute__((always_inline, unused, gnu_inline)) notrace
> +#define __inline \
> + __inline __attribute__((always_inline, unused, gnu_inline)) notrace
Perhaps these are simpler as
#define __inline__ inline
#define __inline inline
> #else
> /* A lot of inline functions can cause havoc with function tracing */
> -#define inline inline __attribute__((unused)) notrace
> -#define __inline__ __inline__ __attribute__((unused)) notrace
> -#define __inline __inline __attribute__((unused)) notrace
> +#define inline inline __attribute__((unused, gnu_inline)) notrace
> +#define __inline__ __inline__ __attribute__((unused, gnu_inline)) notrace
> +#define __inline __inline __attribute__((unused, gnu_inline)) notrace
> #endif
And only set once along with:
> #define __always_inline inline __attribute__((always_inline))
And perhaps this __always_inline should be updated
with gnu_inline as well
Powered by blists - more mailing lists