lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 6 Jun 2018 11:21:01 +0200
From:   Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
To:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>, kernel@...labora.com,
        linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] pwm: cros-ec: Switch to SPDX identifier.

Hi Thierry,

On 06/06/18 11:08, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 07:54:27PM +0200, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
>> Adopt the SPDX license identifier headers to ease license compliance
>> management.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v2: None
>>
>>  drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c | 13 ++++---------
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c
>> index 9c13694eaa24..9bf4cde86765 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c
>> @@ -1,12 +1,7 @@
>> -/*
>> - * Copyright (C) 2016 Google, Inc
>> - *
>> - * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
>> - * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2, as published by
>> - * the Free Software Foundation.
>> - *
>> - * Expose a PWM controlled by the ChromeOS EC to the host processor.
>> - */
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +// Expose a PWM controlled by the ChromeOS EC to the host processor.
>> +//
>> +// Copyright (C) 2016 Google, Inc.
> 
> This is odd. I understand that for some reason there is an exception for
> SPDX license identifies to use C++ style comments, but why would you
> make the whole comment C++ style? Why not just something like the below:
> 

Seems that there is some kind of controversy between different maintainers. I
did in that way because I was complained to use the c-style on other patches,
and seems, that putting everything as // is Linus Torvalds' preferred style:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/25/133

I don't mind to change if the c-style is preferred by the maintainer (others
prefer the c++ style) but I think that would be good get an agreement between
subsystems maintainers and document properly.

Best regards,
 Enric

> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>  /*
>   * Copyright (C) 2016 Google, Inc
>   *
> - * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> - * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2, as published by
> - * the Free Software Foundation.
> - *
>   * Expose a PWM controlled by the ChromeOS EC to the host processor.
>   */
> 
> Thierry
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ