[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180607091816.GT13775@localhost>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 11:18:16 +0200
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...rovitsch.priv.at>,
"Du, Changbin" <changbin.du@...el.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, alex.elder@...aro.org,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, michal.lkml@...kovi.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de,
yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com, lgirdwood@...il.com,
broonie@...nel.org, rdunlap@...radead.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux@...linux.org.uk, linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, kbuild-all@...org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
changbin.du@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] kernel hacking: new config NO_AUTO_INLINE to
disable compiler auto-inline optimizations
On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 02:40:25PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 07-06-18, 11:03, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> > On Thu, 2018-06-07 at 14:08 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > On 07-06-18, 15:46, Du, Changbin wrote:
> > > > I think if the destination is not a null terminated string (If I understand your
> > > > description below), memcpy can be used to get rid of such warning. The warning
> > > > makes sense in general as explained in mannual. Thanks!
> > >
> > > The destination should be a null terminated string eventually, but we first need
> > > to make sure src is a null terminated string.
> >
> > Is there strnlen() or memchr() in the kernel?
> > Then check the source before copying it.
>
> It would be extra work, but memchr can be used to work around this I believe.
>
> @Johan ??
If you want to work around the warning and think you can do it in some
non-contrived way, then go for it.
Clearing the request buffer, checking for termination using strnlen, and
then using memcpy might not be too bad.
But after all, it is a false positive, so leaving things as they stand
is fine too.
Thanks,
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists