[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180607091923.n5q5uzsxuymy3vov@vireshk-i7>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 14:49:23 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...rovitsch.priv.at>,
"Du, Changbin" <changbin.du@...el.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, alex.elder@...aro.org,
kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, michal.lkml@...kovi.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de,
yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com, lgirdwood@...il.com,
broonie@...nel.org, rdunlap@...radead.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux@...linux.org.uk, linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, kbuild-all@...org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
changbin.du@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] kernel hacking: new config NO_AUTO_INLINE to
disable compiler auto-inline optimizations
On 07-06-18, 11:18, Johan Hovold wrote:
> If you want to work around the warning and think you can do it in some
> non-contrived way, then go for it.
>
> Clearing the request buffer, checking for termination using strnlen, and
> then using memcpy might not be too bad.
>
> But after all, it is a false positive, so leaving things as they stand
> is fine too.
Leave it then :)
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists