[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180607154522.hyjmxn3q6zgcvsnx@two.firstfloor.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 08:45:22 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@...b.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] perf/cputime: Don't stop idle tick if there's live
cputime event
On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 12:15:12AM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> Disable stopping of the idle tick when having live cputime
> event. When the tick is disabled, the idle counts are out
> of date until next tick/update and perf cputime PMU provides
> misleading counts.
I really don't like this. This can totally change performance
(e.g. less Turbo due to less idle) and performance tools shouldn't
change the performance profile drastically.
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists