lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPybu_0=ykAcCx=nZyrv90YRfihDxi3s2+Nz+6UP8Fwd5eH2-A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Jun 2018 17:09:14 +0200
From:   Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com>
To:     Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 15/24] net: qualcomm: MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(serdev)

Hi Marcel,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 3:01 PM Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org> wrote:
>
>
> the commit message is misleading me. If I build something with ACPI or DT support, then modinfo will show all modalias information for ACPI and DT compatible strings. What else does udev/modprobe actually need? Is something broken with the modalias export?

The main purpose is to autoload drivers for devices that have been
created via sysfs or another module.

Eg1: We have a serial port on a standard computer that has connected a
GPS module. Since it is something that is not in the ACPI nor the DT
table the user will run

echo serdev_gps > /sys/bus/serial/devices/serial0/new_device

Eg2 module: https://github.com/ribalda/linux/blob/415bb3f0076c2b846ebe5409589b8e1e3004f55a/drivers/tty/serdev/test_platform.c

Modprobe does not know what module to load for that device unless
there is a matching MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE
Today, we have the same functionality for i2c devices
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/i2c/instantiating-devices

I guess the commit message is really bad :), sorry about that. Any
suggestions to improve it?

Thanks!

>
> Regards
>
> Marcel
>


-- 
Ricardo Ribalda

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ