[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180612220125.3scgr6by62wifirp@kahuna>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 17:01:25 -0500
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC: Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
<linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>,
Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] Documentation: arm: ti: Add bindings for AM654
SoC
On 21:05-20180612, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 01:01:20AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
[...]
> > +Boards based on K3 Multicore SoC architecture shall have the following property:
> > +- compatible: Every hardware block introduced in K3 Multicore SoC
> > + architecture shall be of the form:
> > + "ti,XXX-YYY", where:
> > + 'XXX' represents the specific SoC part for which the support is added.
> > + 'YYY' represents the corresponding peripheral in SoC being supported.
>
> No need to explain standard DT convention here. (But I don't think we
> have this convention documented anywhere, so patches welcome. :))
>
Thanks. Will drop off from my series (will skip the generic dts
convention for now ;) ).
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists