[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180612220333.4odussbccwmup26v@kahuna>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 17:03:33 -0500
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC: Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
<linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>,
Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/6] serial: 8250_omap: Add support for AM654 UART
controller
On 21:06-20180612, Rob Herring wrote:
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/omap_serial.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/omap_serial.txt
> > index 4b0f05adb228..c35d5ece1156 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/omap_serial.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/omap_serial.txt
> > @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> > OMAP UART controller
> >
> > Required properties:
> > +- compatible : should be "ti,am654-uart" for AM654 controllers
>
> Not compatible with any existing TI 8250 UARTs?
Base is compatible, however there are differences in DMA operation and
few additional bits. omap4-uart is sufficient for a basic PIO mode of
operation given initialization a bootloader might do for base console.
I will split the bindings off into it's own patch to keep the confusion
to a minimum and allowing serial driver change to go in independently.
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists