[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f5e71bac1bc23f96b7dae64bbdad8e2154c339aa.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 08:53:03 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/of: Add devm_of_iomap()
On Tue, 2018-06-12 at 11:42 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 6:01 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> <benh@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > There are still quite a few cases where a device might want to get to a
> > different node of the device-tree, obtain the resources and map them.
> >
> > Drivers doing that currently open code the whole thing, which is error
> > proe.
> >
> > We have of_iomap() and of_io_request_and_map() but they both have shortcomings,
> > such as not returning the size of the resource found (which can be necessary)
> > and not being "managed".
> >
> > This adds a devm_of_iomap() that provides all of these and should probably
> > replace uses of the above in most drivers.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
> > ---
> >
> > I'm cooking a driver that uses this, if there's no objection I'd like
> > to carry it in my pull request for that driver (it can also exist in
> > the DT tree of course). Just let me know.
>
> We generally only use of_iomap when there is no struct device for any
> new driver. Why can't you use devm_ioremap_resource? Is this a
> non-platform bus device?
This is just a wrapper on devm_ioremap_resource :-) Basically it's a
"fixed" version of of_iomap, that has the devm* management and will
mark the resource busy.
My thinking was to then replace most of_iomap users with this.
As for the specific case of the driver I'm cooking, it's a case where
the SoC contains a little coprocessor (a ColdFire even !) alongside the
main ARM core. I have a driver that offloads the bitbanging of some
GPIOs to it (to implement the FSI bus). I use devm_of_iomap() to map
the registers of the interrupt controller of the coprocessor, it's not
really part of the interrupt tree, it doesn't distribute interrupts to
the ARM or to Linux, it's just a device-node pointed to by a handle.
BTW. Another thing that I find a bit annoying is "allocated" reserved-
memory, there's no API to get to it other than via the DMA APIs or a
CMA, which is overkill in a few circumstances (such as the one here
where I just want to dedicate a bit of memory to the coprocessor).
Right now I'm using a fixed reservation (with a reg property) and go to
it "manually" but that somewhat sucks.
Cheers,
Ben.
>
> >
> > drivers/of/address.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/of_address.h | 5 +++++
> > 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/of/address.c b/drivers/of/address.c
> > index cf83c05f5650..b7d49ee7b690 100644
> > --- a/drivers/of/address.c
> > +++ b/drivers/of/address.c
> > @@ -807,6 +807,41 @@ void __iomem *of_io_request_and_map(struct device_node *np, int index,
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_io_request_and_map);
> >
> > +/*
> > + * devm_of_iomap - Requests a resource and maps the memory mapped IO
> > + * for a given device_node managed by a given device
> > + *
> > + * Checks that a resource is a valid memory region, requests the memory
> > + * region and ioremaps it. All operations are managed and will be undone
> > + * on driver detach of the device.
> > + *
> > + * This is to be used when a device requests/maps resources described
> > + * by other device tree nodes (children or otherwise).
> > + *
> > + * @dev: The device "managing" the resource
> > + * @node: The device-tree node where the resource resides
> > + * @index: index of the MMIO range in the "reg" property
> > + * @size: Returns the size of the resource (pass NULL if not needed)
> > + * Returns a pointer to the requested and mapped memory or an ERR_PTR() encoded
> > + * error code on failure. Usage example:
> > + *
> > + * base = devm_of_iomap(&pdev->dev, node, 0, NULL);
> > + * if (IS_ERR(base))
> > + * return PTR_ERR(base);
> > + */
> > +void __iomem *devm_of_iomap(struct device *dev, struct device_node *node, int index,
> > + resource_size_t *size)
>
> of/address.c generally doesn't depend on struct device. I'd like to
> keep it that way.
>
> Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists