[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJEFLXFf-Vq9c9XC41vBpisQwxkd06_v8Fmt6X=gp=2_g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 16:54:55 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To: Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: stingray: use NUM_SATA to configure number of
sata ports
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Scott Branden
<scott.branden@...adcom.com> wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> Could you please kindly comment on change below.
>
> It allows board variants to be added easily via a simple define for
> different number of SATA ports.
>
>
>
> On 18-06-04 09:22 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>
>> On 05/18/2018 11:34 AM, Scott Branden wrote:
>>>
>>> Move remaining sata configuration to stingray-sata.dtsi and enable
>>> ports based on NUM_SATA defined.
>>> Now, all that needs to be done is define NUM_SATA per board.
>>
>> Rob could you review this and let us know if this approach is okay or
>> not? Thank you!
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>
>>> ---
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/stingray/stingray-sata.dtsi
>>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/stingray/stingray-sata.dtsi
>>> index 8c68e0c..7f6d176 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/stingray/stingray-sata.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/stingray/stingray-sata.dtsi
>>> @@ -43,7 +43,11 @@
>>> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 321 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>> #address-cells = <1>;
>>> #size-cells = <0>;
>>> +#if (NUM_SATA > 0)
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> +#else
>>> status = "disabled";
>>> +#endif
This only works if ports are contiguously enabled (0-N). You might not
care, but it is not a pattern that works in general. And I'm not a fan
of C preprocessing in DT files in general beyond just defines for
single numbers.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists