[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180612115525.yg2mnhlcz6ok3dyo@mwanda>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 14:55:25 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Zhouyang Jia <jiazhouyang09@...il.com>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: gdm724x: add error handling for nlmsg_put
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 01:09:24PM +0800, Zhouyang Jia wrote:
> When nlmsg_put fails, the lack of error-handling code may
> cause unexpected results.
>
> This patch adds error-handling code after calling nlmsg_put.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhouyang Jia <jiazhouyang09@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/gdm724x/netlink_k.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/gdm724x/netlink_k.c b/drivers/staging/gdm724x/netlink_k.c
> index abe2425..4623140 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/gdm724x/netlink_k.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/gdm724x/netlink_k.c
> @@ -119,6 +119,9 @@ int netlink_send(struct sock *sock, int group, u16 type, void *msg, int len)
> seq++;
>
> nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, 0, seq, type, len, 0);
> + if (!nlh)
> + return -EMSGSIZE;
This can't fail. We just allocated skb on the line before and we
allocated enough space for "len". Also if we *did* hit a bug here then
we would need to do some more cleanup instead of a direct return.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists