[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180613114909.alyfvvc5z2g2fbf7@ca-dmjordan1.us.oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 04:49:09 -0700
From: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Zi Yan <zi.yan@...rutgers.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm -V3 03/21] mm, THP, swap: Support PMD swap mapping in
swap_duplicate()
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 09:26:54AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 09:23:19AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> >> Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com> writes:
> >> >> +#else
> >> >> +static inline int __swap_duplicate_cluster(swp_entry_t *entry,
> >> >
> >> > This doesn't need inline.
> >>
> >> Why not? This is just a one line stub.
> >
> > Forgot to respond to this. The compiler will likely choose to optimize out
> > calls to an empty function like this. Checking, this is indeed what it does in
> > this case on my machine, with or without inline.
>
> Yes. I believe a decent compiler will inline the function in any way.
> And it does no harm to keep "inline" too, Yes?
Right, it does no harm, it's just a matter of style.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists