[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87vaano4rl.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 09:26:54 +0800
From: "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Zi Yan <zi.yan@...rutgers.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm -V3 03/21] mm, THP, swap: Support PMD swap mapping in swap_duplicate()
Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 09:23:19AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
>> Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com> writes:
>> >> +#else
>> >> +static inline int __swap_duplicate_cluster(swp_entry_t *entry,
>> >
>> > This doesn't need inline.
>>
>> Why not? This is just a one line stub.
>
> Forgot to respond to this. The compiler will likely choose to optimize out
> calls to an empty function like this. Checking, this is indeed what it does in
> this case on my machine, with or without inline.
Yes. I believe a decent compiler will inline the function in any way.
And it does no harm to keep "inline" too, Yes?
> By the way, when building without CONFIG_THP_SWAP, we get
>
> linux/mm/swapfile.c:933:13: warning: ‘__swap_free_cluster’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> static void __swap_free_cluster(struct swap_info_struct *si, unsigned long idx)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thanks! I will fix this. Don't know why 0-Day didn't catch this.
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
Powered by blists - more mailing lists