[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180613200120.GF2686@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 17:01:20 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas-Mich Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>,
Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf tests: Add valid callback for parse-events test
Em Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 11:34:22AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> Adding optional 'valid' callback for events tests in
> parse-events object, so we don't try to parse PMUs,
> which are not supported.
>
> Following line is displayed for skipped test:
>
> running test 52 'intel_pt//u'... SKIP
Would be nice to test the _parsing_ of this even on machines where this
PMU is not present, as developers using these machines as workstations
may end up breaking this.
Anyway, intel_pt now is in tons of machines, so should be caught easily,
if not by anyone, by me ;-\
- Arnaldo
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-to9naisphr61z23b0br10xhh@git.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> ---
> tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c b/tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c
> index 3b0bfdf5a594..347378ddaa8b 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c
> @@ -1309,6 +1309,11 @@ static int test__checkevent_config_cache(struct perf_evlist *evlist)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static bool test__intel_pt_valid(void)
> +{
> + return !!perf_pmu__find("intel_pt");
> +}
> +
> static int test__intel_pt(struct perf_evlist *evlist)
> {
> struct perf_evsel *evsel = perf_evlist__first(evlist);
> @@ -1375,6 +1380,7 @@ struct evlist_test {
> const char *name;
> __u32 type;
> const int id;
> + bool (*valid)(void);
> int (*check)(struct perf_evlist *evlist);
> };
>
> @@ -1648,6 +1654,7 @@ static struct evlist_test test__events[] = {
> },
> {
> .name = "intel_pt//u",
> + .valid = test__intel_pt_valid,
> .check = test__intel_pt,
> .id = 52,
> },
> @@ -1690,6 +1697,11 @@ static int test_event(struct evlist_test *e)
> struct perf_evlist *evlist;
> int ret;
>
> + if (e->valid && !e->valid()) {
> + pr_debug("... SKIP");
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> evlist = perf_evlist__new();
> if (evlist == NULL)
> return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -1716,10 +1728,11 @@ static int test_events(struct evlist_test *events, unsigned cnt)
> for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) {
> struct evlist_test *e = &events[i];
>
> - pr_debug("running test %d '%s'\n", e->id, e->name);
> + pr_debug("running test %d '%s'", e->id, e->name);
> ret1 = test_event(e);
> if (ret1)
> ret2 = ret1;
> + pr_debug("\n");
> }
>
> return ret2;
> @@ -1801,7 +1814,7 @@ static int test_pmu_events(void)
> }
>
> while (!ret && (ent = readdir(dir))) {
> - struct evlist_test e;
> + struct evlist_test e = { 0 };
> char name[2 * NAME_MAX + 1 + 12 + 3];
>
> /* Names containing . are special and cannot be used directly */
> --
> 2.13.6
Powered by blists - more mailing lists