linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] ubi: introduce ubi.nocheck parameter to skip CRC check when attaching ubi vol

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1588647.N1yrutfcI7@blindfold>
Date:   Thu, 14 Jun 2018 09:29:42 +0200
From:   Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:     Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...tlin.com>
Cc:     dedekind1@...il.com, dwmw2@...radead.org,
        computersforpeace@...il.com, boris.brezillon@...tlin.com,
        marek.vasut@...il.com, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ubi: introduce ubi.nocheck parameter to skip CRC check when attaching ubi vol

Quentin,

Am Montag, 11. Juni 2018, 12:20:37 CEST schrieb Quentin Schulz:
> If we go for a per-image flag, adding nocheck to the ioctl makes sense,
> otherwise we have to find a way to select only one or more volumes for
> which the nocheck flag should be set. That being said, I'm not sure a
> per-image flag is the way we want to go.
> 
> What are your thoughts on this?

I like that approach a lot more, please send a patch. :-)
Having a volume flag will reduce complexity a lot.

Thanks,
//richard