[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5D0fBcwD+6SHor+mGvB=7m8WrTmi-QPTYWjMnQchVATOg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 17:16:31 -0300
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Duan <fugang.duan@....com>,
"A.s. Dong" <aisheng.dong@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"slongerbeam@...il.com" <slongerbeam@...il.com>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: imx6qdl-sabreauto: Add sensors
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 7:17 AM, Leonard Crestez
<leonard.crestez@....com> wrote:
> Should I also assign a label, like "isl29023: light-sensor@44"? I
> couldn't find any recommendation on this.
>
> There are no immediate uses for a label but this practice is very
> common. Having labels allows creating minor board variants with reduced
> churn in the base dts so it seems good.
In the case of this specific board we don't have board variants, so no
need to add a label.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists