linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] scsi: ufs: set the device reference clock setting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <95985.1529095054@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date:   Fri, 15 Jun 2018 16:37:34 -0400
From:   valdis.kletnieks@...edu
To:     Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>
Cc:     "sayalil@...eaurora.org" <sayalil@...eaurora.org>,
        "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
        "vinholikatti@...il.com" <vinholikatti@...il.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "asutoshd@...eaurora.org" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "evgreen@...omium.org" <evgreen@...omium.org>,
        "cang@...eaurora.org" <cang@...eaurora.org>,
        "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "subhashj@...eaurora.org" <subhashj@...eaurora.org>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org" <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>,
        "rnayak@...eaurora.org" <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        "jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "malat@...ian.org" <malat@...ian.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] scsi: ufs: set the device reference clock setting

Actually, it makes it easier to follow the conversation.

On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 13:35:08 -0000, Bart Van Assche said:
> On Thu, 2018-06-14 at 17:03 +0530, sayali wrote:
> > Comment inline.
>
> Hello Sayali,
>
> Please don't use inline replies. That makes it very hard to follow the
> conversation.

Actually, it makes it easier to follow the conversation.

> * If IMAP has been enabled on the Exchange server that you are using then
>   that means that you can choose from the many open source e-mail clients
>   that support IMAP.

Which of the two is easier to follow?


Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped