linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: mediatek: Add system pm support for MT2712

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 15 Jun 2018 10:47:55 +0800
From:   Honghui Zhang <honghui.zhang@...iatek.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
CC:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@...aro.org>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>,
        Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>,
        <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>, <hongkun.cao@...iatek.com>,
        <youlin.pei@...iatek.com>, <yong.wu@...iatek.com>,
        <yt.shen@...iatek.com>, <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
        <xinping.qian@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: mediatek: Add system pm support for MT2712

On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 13:52 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:49 PM, Honghui Zhang
> <honghui.zhang@...iatek.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 13:17 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 6:04 AM,  <honghui.zhang@...iatek.com> wrote:
> >> > From: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zhang@...iatek.com>
> >>
> >> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> >> > +static int mtk_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
> >>
> >> __maybe_unused
> >>
> >
> > Hi, Andy, thanks for your review.
> > Bjorn had point this out that at:
> > https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg656774.html
> 
> Nice, one more maintainer with strong opinion here.
> 
> Arnd, that's what I mentioned as a split in opinions earlier.
> Any new developer or even existing contributor would be now really
> confusing since maintainers asked for two different approaches on the
> same matter.
> 

Hi, Arnd, Do you have any comments about this patch? Sorry I missed the
previous discussion about which should be used for this approach.

thanks.