linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: mediatek: Add system pm support for MT2712

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VcEp2kFO4hncvMS4Dh1AzvoFbrps7+FLmdk0RLyNTHz7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 1 Jun 2018 13:52:44 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Honghui Zhang <honghui.zhang@...iatek.com>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@...aro.org>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com, Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>,
        ryder.lee@...iatek.com, hongkun.cao@...iatek.com,
        youlin.pei@...iatek.com, yong.wu@...iatek.com,
        yt.shen@...iatek.com, sean.wang@...iatek.com,
        xinping.qian@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: mediatek: Add system pm support for MT2712

On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:49 PM, Honghui Zhang
<honghui.zhang@...iatek.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 13:17 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 6:04 AM,  <honghui.zhang@...iatek.com> wrote:
>> > From: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zhang@...iatek.com>
>>
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>> > +static int mtk_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
>>
>> __maybe_unused
>>
>
> Hi, Andy, thanks for your review.
> Bjorn had point this out that at:
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg656774.html

Nice, one more maintainer with strong opinion here.

Arnd, that's what I mentioned as a split in opinions earlier.
Any new developer or even existing contributor would be now really
confusing since maintainers asked for two different approaches on the
same matter.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko