[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180618160829.5jrscmfkorjxdvod@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 17:08:30 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
boqun.feng@...il.com, mingo@...nel.org,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 09/18] atomics/alpha: define atomic64_fetch_add_unless()
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 04:54:40PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 11:19:10AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > /**
> > - * atomic64_add_unless - add unless the number is a given value
> > + * atomic64_fetch_add_unless - add unless the number is a given value
> > * @v: pointer of type atomic64_t
> > * @a: the amount to add to v...
> > * @u: ...unless v is equal to u.
> > *
> > * Atomically adds @a to @v, so long as it was not @u.
> > - * Returns true iff @v was not @u.
> > + * Returns the old value of @v.
> > */
> > -static __inline__ int atomic64_add_unless(atomic64_t *v, long a, long u)
> > +static __inline__ int atomic64_fetch_add_unless(atomic64_t *v, long a, long u)
>
Whoops; yes.
>From a scan of the series, I messed that up in the instrumentation, too,
but the rest sems fine.
I'll fix those up and push out an updated branch.
Thanks,
Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists