linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 04/10] drivers: qcom: rpmh: add RPMH helper functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD=FV=VVLGR-ynvURvQB2yU5HNb0-Z5e-1_McJ1Wu5PFpJ72Yg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 18 Jun 2018 12:54:07 -0700
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Raju P L S S S N <rplsssn@...eaurora.org>,
        Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        "open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT" <linux-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 04/10] drivers: qcom: rpmh: add RPMH helper functions

Hi,

On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 12:06 PM, Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18 2018 at 12:33 -0600, Doug Anderson wrote:
>>
>> Lina,
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 9:39 AM, Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +/**
>>>>  * struct rsc_drv: the Direct Resource Voter (DRV) of the
>>>>  * Resource State Coordinator controller (RSC)
>>>>  *
>>>> @@ -52,6 +78,7 @@ struct tcs_group {
>>>>  * @tcs:        TCS groups
>>>>  * @tcs_in_use: s/w state of the TCS
>>>>  * @lock:       synchronize state of the controller
>>>> + * @ctrl:       controller to handle cases like batch requests
>>>
>>>
>>> This is not only for batch requests.
>>> This is handle to the DRV's client. @client might be a better name than
>>> @ctrlr.
>>
>>
>> The name "ctrlr" also matches the name of the structure.  Are you
>> suggesting also renaming "struct rpmh_ctrlr" to "struct rpmh_client",
>> or you think they should be different names?
>>
> Just the name of the variable. I was just a nice to have. I wouldn't
> block for this though.
>
> I also got a couple Bot reported issues on this and the previous
> revision that I have sent to Raju. He is planning to the post the v12
> tomorrow his time after fixing them. If you can wait until then, I would
> recommend picking up the v12 instead of this.

OK, if Raju can post the v12 tomorrow his time then that sounds like a
great plan to me.  While you're at it, I noticed that checkpatch
yelled about a few lines that were > 80 characters long for no good
reason.  Those would be nice to fix too.

-Doug