linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] platform/x86: touchscreen_dmi: Add info for the ONDA V891W Dual OS tablet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180619080522.40a20951@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Tue, 19 Jun 2018 08:05:22 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        youling257 <youling257@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] platform/x86: touchscreen_dmi: Add info for the ONDA
 V891W Dual OS tablet

Hi Andy,

On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 16:59:30 +0300 Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > youling has indicated to me (off-list) that he does not
> > want to use his real name.
> >
> > He has already provided me with the touchscreen details
> > and dmi strings for this tablet a while ago and I had
> > writing the exact same quirk on my TODO list already.
> >
> > As such I've no doubt that he created this patch and
> > has the rights to Submit it under the GPL license.
> >
> > So I'm going to resubmit this with his S-o-b removed
> > and replaced with mine. Where the intent of my
> > S-o-b is to certify point c. of the certificate
> > of origin, quoting from:
> >
> > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#developer-s-certificate-of-origin-1-1
> >
> > "c. The contribution was provided directly to me by some other person who
> > certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified it."
> >
> > This seems better then me re-creating the exact
> > same patch from scratch.  
> 
> I guess this will not pass checks Stephen has.
> So, Stephen, how should we proceed?

That's fine.  I amy report it (If I forget this email), but you can
just ignore the report.  My scripted checks obviously can't take this
case into account.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped