linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] platform/x86: touchscreen_dmi: Add info for the ONDA V891W Dual OS tablet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VeO-3AAvYXP3=bShpec4YzDRXwEKCAP_HwfQpzoLCcZ1A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 2 Jul 2018 15:22:50 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        youling257 <youling257@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] platform/x86: touchscreen_dmi: Add info for the ONDA
 V891W Dual OS tablet

On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 1:05 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 16:59:30 +0300 Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:

>> > youling has indicated to me (off-list) that he does not
>> > want to use his real name.
>> >
>> > He has already provided me with the touchscreen details
>> > and dmi strings for this tablet a while ago and I had
>> > writing the exact same quirk on my TODO list already.
>> >
>> > As such I've no doubt that he created this patch and
>> > has the rights to Submit it under the GPL license.
>> >
>> > So I'm going to resubmit this with his S-o-b removed
>> > and replaced with mine. Where the intent of my
>> > S-o-b is to certify point c. of the certificate
>> > of origin, quoting from:
>> >
>> > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#developer-s-certificate-of-origin-1-1
>> >
>> > "c. The contribution was provided directly to me by some other person who
>> > certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified it."
>> >
>> > This seems better then me re-creating the exact
>> > same patch from scratch.
>>
>> I guess this will not pass checks Stephen has.
>> So, Stephen, how should we proceed?
>
> That's fine.  I amy report it (If I forget this email), but you can
> just ignore the report.  My scripted checks obviously can't take this
> case into account.

Thanks!

I have pushed to my review and testing queue as is.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko