[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VebpdEujHFeE=_ZHqHSKq+LD2V5SqL6J+YM_2R2CX4jiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 23:09:30 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: John Whitmore <johnfwhitmore@...il.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] staging: rtl8192u: Truncate block comments to 80
character length - Style
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 10:55 PM, John Whitmore <johnfwhitmore@...il.com> wrote:
> Where possible truncation of block comments to the 80 character length
> prefered by the coding style.
Is it somehow automated?!
> /*
> - * 8190 only, Realtek proprietary aggregation mode
> - * Set MPDUDensity=2, 1: Set MPDUDensity=2(32k) for Realtek AP and set MPDUDensity=0(8k) for others
> + * 8190 only, Realtek proprietary aggregation mode Set MPDUDensity=2,
> + * 1: Set MPDUDensity=2(32k) for Realtek AP
> + * and set MPDUDensity=0(8k) for others
> */
This is just an example how it should NOT be done.
The original looks better than the result in terms of understanding.
Had you (re-)read the result?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists