[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180619073115.GA241700@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:31:15 -0700
From: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
To: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] rcutorture: Fix rcu_barrier successes counter
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 11:22:15PM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>
>
> rcutorture currently increments both successes and error counters for
> the rcu_barrier test incase of errors. It should only increment the
> error counter incase of errors so make it do so.
>
> Test: Introduced rcu_barrier errors by returning from the barrier
> callback without incrementing the callback counter.
Hi Paul,
Think some more about this counter, I think you mean 'successes' as in
'successful attempts' than 'successful test' ? If so, then perhaps you can
drop this patch. It wasn't clear to me what the 'successes' meant so I may
have been a bit misled into changing its meaning. If on the other hand, it
means 'successful test', then yes this patch would be Ok then. thanks! -Joel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists