linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] rcutorture: Fix rcu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180619091223.702f05d6@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Tue, 19 Jun 2018 09:12:23 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
Cc:     Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] rcutorture: Fix rcu_barrier successes counter

On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:31:15 -0700
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com> wrote:

> Hi Paul,
> Think some more about this counter, I think you mean 'successes' as in
> 'successful attempts' than 'successful test' ? If so, then perhaps you can
> drop this patch. It wasn't clear to me what the 'successes' meant so I may
> have been a bit misled into changing its meaning. If on the other hand, it
> means 'successful test', then yes this patch would be Ok then. thanks! -Joel
>  

In either case, it sounds like a comment should be added to clarify
what n_barrier_successes actually means ;-)

-- Steve