[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180619095202.GB13617@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 11:52:02 +0200
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...com, pjt@...gle.com, luto@...capital.net,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/9] cpuset: Enable cpuset controller in default
hierarchy
Hi,
On 18/06/18 12:13, Waiman Long wrote:
> v10:
> - Remove the cpuset.sched.load_balance patch for now as it may not
> be that useful.
> - Break the large patch 2 into smaller patches to make them a bit
> easier to review.
> - Test and fix issues related to changing "cpuset.cpus" and cpu
> online/offline in a domain root.
> - Rename isolated_cpus to reserved_cpus as this cpumask holds CPUs
> reserved for child sched domains.
> - Rework the scheduling domain debug printing code in the last patch.
> - Document update to the newly moved
> Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst.
By removing the redundant 6/9 as advised, I could test that this is
working as expected (at least by me :): https://git.io/fURIC
I played a bit with creating and modifying domain root(s), both with
legacy and default hierarchies. Looks good to me, you can add
Tested-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
to the series.
Best,
- Juri
Powered by blists - more mailing lists