[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180620141144.GI2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 16:11:44 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...com, pjt@...gle.com, luto@...capital.net,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 3/9] cpuset: Simulate auto-off of sched.domain_root
at cgroup removal
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 12:14:02PM +0800, Waiman Long wrote:
> @@ -1058,7 +1060,12 @@ static int update_reserved_cpumask(struct cpuset *cpuset,
> * Check if any CPUs in addmask or delmask are in the effective_cpus
> * of a sibling cpuset. The implied cpu_exclusive of a scheduling
> * domain root will ensure there are no overlap in cpus_allowed.
> + *
> + * This check is skipped if the cpuset is dying.
Comments that state what the code does are mostly useless; please
explain _why_ if anything.
> */
> + if (dying)
> + goto updated_reserved_cpus;
> +
> rcu_read_lock();
> cpuset_for_each_child(sibling, pos_css, parent) {
> if ((sibling == cpuset) || !(sibling->css.flags & CSS_ONLINE))
Powered by blists - more mailing lists