[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180619120714.GE13685@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 14:07:14 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>
Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@....com>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
tnowicki@...iumnetworks.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, wanghuiqiang@...wei.com,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
zhongjiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>,
linux-arm <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: avoid alloc memory on offline node
On Tue 19-06-18 20:03:07, Xie XiuQi wrote:
[...]
> I tested on a arm board with 128 cores 4 numa nodes, but I set CONFIG_NR_CPUS=72.
> Then node 3 is not be created, because node 3 has no memory, and no cpu.
> But some pci device may related to node 3, which be set in ACPI table.
Could you double check that zonelists for node 3 are generated
correctly?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists