[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2Hydhi1Hu3_Dm-arMGOT-Xz1yShwwcRKav44WjGmG4wQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 16:05:38 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
Cc: y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>,
Jerome Forissier <jerome.forissier@...aro.org>,
Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@...aro.org>,
Joakim Bech <joakim.bech@...aro.org>,
Volodymyr Babchuk <vlad.babchuk@...il.com>,
tiger-yu99 <tigeryu99@...mail.com>,
David Wang <david.wang@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tee: replace getnstimeofday64() with ktime_get_real_ts64()
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 3:37 PM, Jens Wiklander
<jens.wiklander@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 04:24:56PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> The two do the same thing, but we want to have a consistent
>> naming in the kernel.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>> ---
>> drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c b/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c
>> index 41aea12e2bcc..b45c73dd37a5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c
>> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ static void handle_rpc_func_cmd_get_time(struct optee_msg_arg *arg)
>> OPTEE_MSG_ATTR_TYPE_VALUE_OUTPUT)
>> goto bad;
>>
>> - getnstimeofday64(&ts);
>> + ktime_get_real_ts64(&ts);
>> arg->params[0].u.value.a = ts.tv_sec;
>> arg->params[0].u.value.b = ts.tv_nsec;
>>
>> --
>> 2.9.0
>>
>
> Looks good.
>
> Acked-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
Thanks for the review. Can you pick it up in your tree?
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists