[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5B2B6DEA.2090100@hisilicon.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 10:20:42 +0100
From: Wei Xu <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
CC: <catalin.marinas@....com>, <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
<dave.martin@....com>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<marc.zyngier@....com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>, <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>,
huangdaode <huangdaode@...ilicon.com>,
"Chenxin (Charles)" <charles.chenxin@...wei.com>,
"Xiongfanggou (James)" <james.xiong@...wei.com>,
"Liguozhu (Kenneth)" <liguozhu@...ilicon.com>,
Zhangyi ac <zhangyi.ac@...wei.com>,
<jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
"Shameerali Kolothum Thodi" <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>,
Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@...wei.com>,
"Zhuangyuzeng (Yisen)" <yisen.zhuang@...wei.com>,
"Wangzhou (B)" <wangzhou1@...ilicon.com>,
"kongxinwei (A)" <kong.kongxinwei@...ilicon.com>,
"Liyuan (Larry, Turing Solution)" <Larry.T@...wei.com>,
<libeijian@...ilicon.com>
Subject: Re: KVM guest sometimes failed to boot because of kernel stack
overflow if KPTI is enabled on a hisilicon ARM64 platform.
Hi James,
On 2018/6/21 9:38, James Morse wrote:
> Hi Will, Wei,
>
> On 20/06/18 17:25, Wei Xu wrote:
>> On 2018/6/20 23:54, James Morse wrote:
>> I have disabled CONFIG_ARM64_RAS_EXTN and reverted that commit.
>> But I still got the stack overflow issue sometimes.
>> Do you have more hint?
>
>> The log is as below:
>> [ 0.000000] Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0000000000 [0x480fd010]
>> [ 0.000000] Linux version 4.17.0-45865-g2b31fe7-dirty
>
> Could you reproduce this with v4.17? This says there are ~45,000 extra patches,
> and un-committed changes. None of the hashes so far have been commits in
> mainline, so we have no idea what this tree is.
>
I have tried v4.17 and log is as below and also it can be found in the first mail
of this thread.
[ 0.000000] Linux version 4.17.0-45864-g29dcea8-dirty
(joyx@...ing-Arch-b) (gcc version 4.9.1 20140505 (prerelease) (crosstool-NG
linaro-1.13.1-4.9-2014.05 - Linaro GCC 4.9-2014.05)) #6 SMP PREEMPT Fri Jun
15 21:39:52 CST 2018
I will try v4.17.2 and v4.18-rc1.
>
>> (joyx@...ing-Arch-b) (gcc version 4.9.1 20140505 (prerelease) (crosstool-NG
>> linaro-1.13.1-4.9-2014.05 - Linaro GCC 4.9-2014.05)) #10 SMP PREEMPT Wed Jun 20
>> 23:59:05 CST 2018
>
>> [ 0.000000] CPU0: using LPI pending table @0x000000007d860000
>> [ 0.000000] GIC: PPI11 is secure or misconfigured
>> [ 0.000000] arch_timer: WARNING: Invalid trigger for IRQ3, assuming level
>> low
>> [ 0.000000] arch_timer: WARNING: Please fix your firmware
>> [ 0.000000] arch_timer: cp15 timer(s) running at 100.00MHz (virt).
>
> (No idea what these mean, but I doubt they are relevant)
>
I will try with mainline qemu 2.12.0.
Thanks!
Best Regards,
Wei
>
>> [ 0.042421] Insufficient stack space to handle exception!
>> [ 0.042423] ESR: 0x96000046 -- DABT (current EL)
>> [ 0.043730] FAR: 0xffff0000093a80e0
>> [ 0.044714] Task stack: [0xffff0000093a8000..0xffff0000093ac000]
>
> This was a level 2 translation fault on a write, to an address that is within
> the stack....
>
>
>> [ 0.051113] IRQ stack: [0xffff000008000000..0xffff000008004000]
>> [ 0.057610] Overflow stack: [0xffff80003efce2f0..0xffff80003efcf2f0]
>> [ 0.064003] CPU: 0 PID: 12 Comm: migration/0 Not tainted
>> 4.17.0-45865-g2b31fe7-dirty #10
>> [ 0.072201] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
>
>> [ 0.076797] pstate: 604003c5 (nZCv DAIF +PAN -UAO)
>> [ 0.081727] pc : el1_sync+0x0/0xb0
>
> ... from the vectors.
>
>
>> [ 0.085217] lr : kpti_install_ng_mappings+0x120/0x214
>
> What I think is happening is: we come out of the kpti idmap with the stack
> unmapped. Shortly after we access the stack, which faults. el1_sync faults as
> well when it tries to push the registers to the stack, and we keep going until
> we overflow the stack.
>
> I can't reproduce this with kvmtool or qemu in the model.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> James
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists