[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180621092331.p2pmaiu6563kp5u2@techsingularity.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 10:23:32 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To: Jirka Hladky <jhladky@...hat.com>
Cc: Jakub Racek <jracek@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
"kkolakow@...hat.com" <kkolakow@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [4.17 regression] Performance drop on kernel-4.17 visible on
Stream, Linpack and NAS parallel benchmarks
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 07:25:19PM +0200, Jirka Hladky wrote:
> Hi Mel and others,
>
> I would like to let you know that I have tested following patch
>
Understood. FWIW, there is a lot in flight at the moment but the first
likely patch is removing rate limiting entirely and see what falls out.
The rest of the experiment series deals with fast-scan-start, reset of
preferred_nid on cross-node load balancing and dealing with THP false
sharing but it's all preliminary and untested.
Furthermore, matters have been complicated by the posting of "Fixes for
sched/numa_balancing". My own testing indicates that this helped which
means that I need to review this first and then rebase anything else on
top of it.
I would also suggest you test that series paying particular attention to
whether it a) improves performance and b) how close it gets to the
revert in terms of overall performance.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists