[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <15108.1529795694@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2018 00:14:54 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
fenghua.yu@...el.com, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com, gavin.hindman@...el.com,
jithu.joseph@...el.com, dave.hansen@...el.com, mingo@...hat.com,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 00/41] Intel(R) Resource Director Technology Cache Pseudo-Locking enabling
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> - Stick the struct into the local header file and not at some random place in
> the source.
Why? It's only used in that one file. There doesn't seem to be any
particular need to share it around.
> - Get rid of the fugly camel case
It's not camel case. It's the name of the option it's encoding. But if it
makes you happy...
> - Move the enablement into a separate function
Okay.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists