lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 23 Jun 2018 11:40:18 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Michael Straube <michael.straube@...teo.de>
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: fix brace coding style issues

On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 03:27:46PM +0200, Michael Straube wrote:
> On 06/22/18 12:28, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > >   	if (count < 1)
> > >   		return -EFAULT;
> > > -	if (buffer && !copy_from_user(tmp, buffer, sizeof(tmp))) {
> > > +	if (buffer && !copy_from_user(tmp, buffer, sizeof(tmp)))
> > >   		sscanf(tmp, "%u", &g_wait_hiq_empty);
> > > -	}
> > 
> > 
> > The original code is kind of bad.  The NULL check isn't required.
> 
> Just for clarification, NULL check refers to checking if buffer != NULL in the
> if condition?
> 
>        if (buffer && !copy_from_user(tmp, buffer, sizeof(tmp)))
>            ~~~~~~

Yes.  If buffer is NULL that's just another invalid pointer which the
user cannot access, it's not special, and the copy will fail.

regards,
dan carpenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ