linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: fix brace coding style issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VeASBAsBrrq65qhkAGXHoSE8Hg-9dSGcgjT2bNND-1MBw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 25 Jun 2018 12:47:44 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:     Michael Straube <michael.straube@...teo.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: fix brace coding style issues

On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 1:28 PM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 08:21:55PM +0200, Michael Straube wrote:
>> Remove braces from single line if statements.
>> Also fix a comparsion to NULL in one of the conditions.
>> Issues found by checkpatch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Straube <michael.straube@...teo.de>
>> ---
>>  drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_debug.c | 6 ++----
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_debug.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_debug.c
>> index f852fde47350..2244ed72ab9c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_debug.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_debug.c
>> @@ -618,9 +618,8 @@ ssize_t proc_set_wait_hiq_empty(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer, si
>>       if (count < 1)
>>               return -EFAULT;
>>
>> -     if (buffer && !copy_from_user(tmp, buffer, sizeof(tmp))) {
>> +     if (buffer && !copy_from_user(tmp, buffer, sizeof(tmp)))
>>               sscanf(tmp, "%u", &g_wait_hiq_empty);
>> -     }
>
>
> The original code is kind of bad.  The NULL check isn't required.
> The sscanf call should have error checking.  The error code is wrong if
> the copy from user fails.  The tmp buffer isn't NUL terminated.
>
>         if (copy_from_user(tmp, buffer, sizeof(tmp)))
>                 return -EFAULT;
>         tmp[sizeof(tmp) - 1] = '\0';
>
>         if (sscanf(tmp, "%u", &g_wait_hiq_empty) != 1)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>
>         return count;

Shouldn't this be

kstrtouint_from_user()

instead of all those lines?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko