lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 24 Jun 2018 15:15:25 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>
cc:     linux@...linux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@....com,
        will.deacon@....com, jonas@...thpole.se,
        stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi, shorne@...il.com,
        jason@...edaemon.net, marc.zyngier@....com, arnd@...db.de,
        keescook@...omium.org, vladimir.murzin@....com,
        nicolas.pitre@...aro.org, jinb.park7@...il.com,
        yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, pombredanne@...b.com,
        kstewart@...uxfoundation.org, jhogan@...nel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org,
        james.morse@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, openrisc@...ts.librecores.org
Subject: Re: Finish the GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER conversion

On Thu, 21 Jun 2018, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> A while ago I sent a patch set that adds a GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER,
> which is an exact copy of the existing IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER support in the
> arm port, which is being used unconditionally by arm64 and openrisc.
> GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER is currently being used by the RISC-V port.  I
> managed to make a few mistakes in my original patch set and as a result
> my conversion of the other architectures of GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER
> was dropped.
> 
> This patch set finishes up my original patch set by converting arm,
> arm64, and openrisc over to the new GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER support
> and then removing MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER as it's obselete.
> 
> At the time I wrote this I gave it fairly extensive build testing, but
> went I recently rebased it I just tested the full patch set on arm,
> arm64, and openrisc defconfigs.
> 
> Various flavors of this patch set have bounced around a few times
> before, but I'm calling this a whole new patch set as it builds on top
> of what was merged.

I'll take the whole pile through tip irq/core which probably makes the most
sense unless there are any objections from architecture maintainers.

Thanks,

	tglx

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ