[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mhng-ef3db5ea-d5f5-4d51-b32c-1b9ca38abccf@palmer-si-x1c4>
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2018 11:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de
CC: linux@...linux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@....com,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, jonas@...thpole.se,
stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi, shorne@...il.com,
jason@...edaemon.net, marc.zyngier@....com,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, keescook@...omium.org,
vladimir.murzin@....com, nicolas.pitre@...aro.org,
jinb.park7@...il.com, yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com,
alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, pombredanne@...b.com,
kstewart@...uxfoundation.org, jhogan@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org,
james.morse@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, openrisc@...ts.librecores.org
Subject: Re: Finish the GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER conversion
On Sun, 24 Jun 2018 06:15:25 PDT (-0700), tglx@...utronix.de wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2018, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> A while ago I sent a patch set that adds a GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER,
>> which is an exact copy of the existing IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER support in the
>> arm port, which is being used unconditionally by arm64 and openrisc.
>> GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER is currently being used by the RISC-V port. I
>> managed to make a few mistakes in my original patch set and as a result
>> my conversion of the other architectures of GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER
>> was dropped.
>>
>> This patch set finishes up my original patch set by converting arm,
>> arm64, and openrisc over to the new GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER support
>> and then removing MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER as it's obselete.
>>
>> At the time I wrote this I gave it fairly extensive build testing, but
>> went I recently rebased it I just tested the full patch set on arm,
>> arm64, and openrisc defconfigs.
>>
>> Various flavors of this patch set have bounced around a few times
>> before, but I'm calling this a whole new patch set as it builds on top
>> of what was merged.
>
> I'll take the whole pile through tip irq/core which probably makes the most
> sense unless there are any objections from architecture maintainers.
Thanks! Unless I've managed to screw something up I don't see these in your
tree, but I also don't see any feedback from anyone else.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists