[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <630b72f7-d7f1-2975-8974-f6540f1b61dc@st.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 17:04:55 +0200
From: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Ludovic BARRE <ludovic.barre@...com>
CC: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
<linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/4] watchdog: stm32: add pclk feature for stm32mp1
On 06/25/2018 03:15 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 06/25/2018 05:52 AM, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
>> Hi Guenter,
>>
>>
>>>> But you are right I forgot to change stm32f429.dtsi.
>>>> If I add a commit for stm32f429.dtsi, it's Ok for you ?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Not really. You are imposing a personal preference on others,
>>> and you would make stm32f429.dtsi inconsistent since it doesn't
>>> use clock names for anything else.This in turn means that people
>>> will have an endless source of irritation since they will need
>>> a clock name for this node but not for others.
>>
>> Why? This kind of implementation depends on each driver. Isn't ?
>>
>> Or do you mean that if iwdg driver uses this implementation (clock
>> name usage) all nodes inside stm32f429.dtsi should follow the same
>> implementation ?
>>
>>>
>>> You will have to get the arm and DT maintainers to agree on this change.
>>
>> As this patch makes easier integration of new platform, I agree with
>> Ludovic proposition.
>>
>
> Please provide a formal Acked-by:.
Sure
Acked-by: Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...com>
Ludovic, can you please resend a version by adding updates for
stm32f429.dtsi.
Thanks
Alex
>
> Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists