[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1529908015-7256-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 15:26:55 +0900
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
To: jiangshanlai@...il.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@....com,
joel@...lfernandes.org
Subject: [PATCH] rcu: Make it stop complaining about docbook function-header comment
Running "make htmldocs" complains about the docbook function-header
comment. It wants the "irq" parameter described which wasn't done by
a commit 5e5ea52645b197 (rcu: Refactor rcu_{nmi,irq}_{enter,exit}()).
So add its description of the parameter to the comment.
Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 4ed74f1..6c5a7f0 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -774,6 +774,7 @@ void rcu_user_enter(void)
/**
* rcu_nmi_exit_common - inform RCU of exit from NMI context
+ * @irq: Is this call from rcu_irq_exit?
*
* If we are returning from the outermost NMI handler that interrupted an
* RCU-idle period, update rdtp->dynticks and rdtp->dynticks_nmi_nesting
@@ -933,6 +934,7 @@ void rcu_user_exit(void)
/**
* rcu_nmi_enter_common - inform RCU of entry to NMI context
+ * @irq: Is this call from rcu_irq_enter?
*
* If the CPU was idle from RCU's viewpoint, update rdtp->dynticks and
* rdtp->dynticks_nmi_nesting to let the RCU grace-period handling know
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists