[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e006b351-a2d7-e269-4e1f-d5ffa67d25d6@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 11:00:46 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: "Bae, Chang Seok" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Metzger, Markus T" <markus.t.metzger@...el.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] x86/vdso: Move out the CPU number store
On 06/25/18 08:40, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2018, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 11:02 AM Bae, Chang Seok
>> <chang.seok.bae@...el.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Still setup_cpu_number() sucks.
>>>
>>> How about setup_cpu_and_node_number()?
>>
>> setup_fast_cpu_node_nr()? setup_cpunr_regs()? I don't have any
>> brilliant ideas. Thomas?
>
> It's really hard to find a good one. setup_cpu_node_cache() might work, but
> it's not brilliant either.
>
Since this applies to the getcpu(2) system call (in addition to the
kernel usage), perhaps setup_getcpu()?
-hpa
Powered by blists - more mailing lists