[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180625180237.GC17417@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 20:02:37 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>,
David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] ARM: davinci: step towards removing
at24_platform_data
> With my patch 1/14 you'll get -EPROBE_DEFER from nvmem_cell_get() if
> the nvmem provider is not yet registered. Will that help in your case?
I don't think so. My driver instantiates the AT24 device. So if i get
-EPROBE_DEFER, i need to cleanup the probe, and return -EPROBDE_DEFER
to the code. Which means i need to remove the AT24 device...
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists