[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180626194327.GP2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 21:43:27 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Allan Xavier <allan.x.xavier@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] objtool: Fix GCC 8 cold function processing without
-freorder-functions
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 01:44:05PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 07:31:18PM +0100, Allan Xavier wrote:
> > Is there a particular concern you're trying to address by having the logic there
> > instead?
>
> Thanks for the patch and the excellent problem description. I think the
> concern is that the overlap might cause other unforeseen issues (now or
> in the future).
Yeah, overlapping symbols are just really weird and unfortunate, I've no
idea what the GCC people were thinking.
Note how find_symbol_containing() already more or less assumed !overlap.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists