linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] w1: Allow compile test of GPIO consumers if !GPIOLIB

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 26 Jun 2018 09:33:36 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] w1: Allow compile test of GPIO consumers if !GPIOLIB

On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 8:54 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:

> The GPIO subsystem provides dummy GPIO consumer functions if GPIOLIB is
> not enabled. Hence drivers that depend on GPIOLIB, but use GPIO consumer
> functionality only, can still be compiled if GPIOLIB is not enabled.
>
> Relax the dependency on GPIOLIB if COMPILE_TEST is enabled, where
> appropriate.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> Acked-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
> ---
> v3:
>   - Add Acked-by,

I think my last change to w1 I just put into the GPIO tree.

Should I simply carry this patch in the GPIO tree?

Yours,
Linus Walleij