[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVQtCh-qbD+ne_iL2tfgwiEN41B_3Eva8-Sg06BhT5PSw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 09:36:16 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] w1: Allow compile test of GPIO consumers if !GPIOLIB
Hi Linus,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 9:34 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 8:54 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > The GPIO subsystem provides dummy GPIO consumer functions if GPIOLIB is
> > not enabled. Hence drivers that depend on GPIOLIB, but use GPIO consumer
> > functionality only, can still be compiled if GPIOLIB is not enabled.
> >
> > Relax the dependency on GPIOLIB if COMPILE_TEST is enabled, where
> > appropriate.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> > Acked-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
> > ---
> > v3:
> > - Add Acked-by,
>
> I think my last change to w1 I just put into the GPIO tree.
>
> Should I simply carry this patch in the GPIO tree?
Fine for me ;-)
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists