linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: multi_v7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <120d8997-3184-bfed-26b7-e0ac7d995b74@st.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Jun 2018 11:47:12 +0000
From:   Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@...com>
To:     Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:     "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: enable STM32 SPI

Hi Alex

On 06/26/2018 10:44 AM, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
> Hi Amélie
> 
> On 05/17/2018 04:21 PM, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
>> Enable the STM32 SPI driver, implemented on STM32MP1 SoC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@...com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig 
>> b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
>> index 89167cd..f990335 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
>> @@ -411,6 +411,7 @@ CONFIG_SPI_S3C64XX=m
>>   CONFIG_SPI_SH_MSIOF=m
>>   CONFIG_SPI_SH_HSPI=y
>>   CONFIG_SPI_SIRF=y
>> +CONFIG_SPI_STM32=y
>>   CONFIG_SPI_SUN4I=y
>>   CONFIG_SPI_SUN6I=y
>>   CONFIG_SPI_TEGRA114=y
>>
> 
> Driver which are are not "vital" to boot STM32 platform should be 
> defined as module. It's the case for this one. Isn't ?
> 

You're right. I'll send v2 with CONFIG_SPI_STM32=m ASAP. Should I resend 
the whole patchset (with DT), or just this patch and you take the DT 
patches as they are ?

Regards,
Amelie