lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 26 Jun 2018 14:13:20 +0200
From:   Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
To:     Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@...com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:     "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: enable STM32 SPI



On 06/26/2018 01:47 PM, Amelie DELAUNAY wrote:
> Hi Alex
> 
> On 06/26/2018 10:44 AM, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
>> Hi Amélie
>> 
>> On 05/17/2018 04:21 PM, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
>>> Enable the STM32 SPI driver, implemented on STM32MP1 SoC.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@...com>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 1 +
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig 
>>> b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
>>> index 89167cd..f990335 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
>>> @@ -411,6 +411,7 @@ CONFIG_SPI_S3C64XX=m
>>>   CONFIG_SPI_SH_MSIOF=m
>>>   CONFIG_SPI_SH_HSPI=y
>>>   CONFIG_SPI_SIRF=y
>>> +CONFIG_SPI_STM32=y
>>>   CONFIG_SPI_SUN4I=y
>>>   CONFIG_SPI_SUN6I=y
>>>   CONFIG_SPI_TEGRA114=y
>>>
>> 
>> Driver which are are not "vital" to boot STM32 platform should be 
>> defined as module. It's the case for this one. Isn't ?
>> 
> 
> You're right. I'll send v2 with CONFIG_SPI_STM32=m ASAP. Should I resend
> the whole patchset (with DT), or just this patch and you take the DT
> patches as they are ?
> 

No, you can just resend this one. I will take DT part from this version.

Regards
Alex

> Regards,
> Amelie

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ