[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180626003513.27812-13-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 17:34:59 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/27] rcu: Remove "inline" from rcu_perf_print_module_parms()
This function is in rcuperf.c, which is not an include file, so there
is no problem dropping the "inline", especially given that this function
is invoked only twice per rcuperf run. This commit therefore delegates
the inlining decision to the compiler by dropping the "inline".
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c b/kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c
index 00e395c0d7d0..3e86940245d9 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c
@@ -536,7 +536,7 @@ rcu_perf_writer(void *arg)
return 0;
}
-static inline void
+static void
rcu_perf_print_module_parms(struct rcu_perf_ops *cur_ops, const char *tag)
{
pr_alert("%s" PERF_FLAG
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists