[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180626003513.27812-3-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 17:34:49 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/27] rcu: rcupdate.h: Get rid of Sphinx warnings at rcu_pointer_handoff()
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
The code example at rcupdate.h currently produce lots of warnings:
./include/linux/rcupdate.h:572: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
./include/linux/rcupdate.h:576: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
./include/linux/rcupdate.h:580: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
./include/linux/rcupdate.h:582: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
./include/linux/rcupdate.h:582: WARNING: Inline literal start-string without end-string.
This commit therefore changes it to a code-block.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index 5cab15e7ec83..dacc90358b33 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -566,8 +566,8 @@ static inline void rcu_preempt_sleep_check(void) { }
* This is simply an identity function, but it documents where a pointer
* is handed off from RCU to some other synchronization mechanism, for
* example, reference counting or locking. In C11, it would map to
- * kill_dependency(). It could be used as follows:
- * ``
+ * kill_dependency(). It could be used as follows::
+ *
* rcu_read_lock();
* p = rcu_dereference(gp);
* long_lived = is_long_lived(p);
@@ -578,7 +578,6 @@ static inline void rcu_preempt_sleep_check(void) { }
* p = rcu_pointer_handoff(p);
* }
* rcu_read_unlock();
- *``
*/
#define rcu_pointer_handoff(p) (p)
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists